Rhetoric Bibliography

prepared by
James D. Hester
for the Rhetorical New Testament Project
Institute for Antiquity and Christianity
Claremont, CA
1990 - 1993

  1. Aletti, Jean Noel. La presence d'un modele rhetorique en Romains: son role et son importance. Biblica. 1990; 71(1):1-24.

  2. ---. Romans 1:18-3:20 - incoherence ou coherence de l'argumentation paulinienne? Biblica. 1988; 69(1):47-62.

  3. Alexandre, Manuel. Rhetorical Argumentation as an Exegetical Technique in Philo of Alexandria. in: A. Caquot, M. Hadas-Lebel and J. Riaud, editors. Hellenica et Judaica; 1986; pp. 13-27.

  4. Anderson, B. W. The New Frontier of Rhetorical Criticism. in: J. J. Jackson and M. Kessler, editors. Rhetorical Criticism. Pittsburgh; 1974; p. ix-xviii.

  5. Anderson, Luke. Enthymeme and Dialectic: Cloister and Classroom. in: E. Elder, editor. From Cloister to Classroom; 1986; pp. 239-274.

  6. Aner, K. Zum Paulusbild der deutschen Aufklärung. in. Harnack-Ehrung: Beitrage zur Kirchengeschichte, ihrem Lehrer Adolf von Harnack zu seinem siebgsten Geburtstage (7 Mar. 1921), dargebracht von einer Reihe seiner Schuler. Leipzig: Hinrichs; 1921; pp. 366-376.

  7. Archer, R. L. The Epistolary Form in the New Testament. Expository Times. 1951(63):296-298.

  8. . Atkins, J. W. H. Literary Criticism in Antiquity. London: Methuen and Co.; 1952;2 vols.

  9. Augustine. On Christian Doctrine. D. W. Robertson, translator. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1958.

  10. . Aune, David E., editor. Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1988.

  11. ---. The New Testament in its Literary Environment. Philadelphia: Westminster; 1987.

  12. ---. Review of Betz's Galatians. Religious Studies Review. 1981; 7:324-325.

  13. ---. Romans as a LOGOS PROTREPTIKOS in the Context of Ancient Religious and Philosophical Propaganda. in: K. P. Donfried, editor. The Roman Debate: Revised and Expanded Edition. Edinburgh: T and T Clark; 1991.

  14. Balch, David L. Two Apologetic Encomia: Dionysius on Rome and Josephus on the Jews. Journal for the Study of Judaism. 1982 Dec; 13:102-122.

  15. Barnett, S. E. Paul Becomes a Literary influence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1941.

  16. Barr, A. The Factor of Testimony in the Gospels. Expository Times. 1937; 49:401-408.

  17. Barrett, Charles Kingsley. Galatians as an 'Apologetic' Letter. Interpretation. 1980; 34:414-17.

  18. Beale, Walter H. Rhetorical Performative Discourse: A New Theory of Epideictic. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1978; 11:221-246.

  19. Beare, Francis W. St. Paul and His Letters. London: Adam & Charles Black; 1962.

  20. Behrens, Rudolf. Problematische Rhetorik. München: Fink; 1982.

  21. Berchman, Robert M. Galatians 1:1-5: Paul and Greco-Roman Rhetoric. in: Jacob Neusner & Ernst S. Frerichs, editors. New Perspectives on Ancient Judaism. Judaic and Christian Interpretation of Texts: Contents and Contexts. Lanham: University Press of America; 1987; 3.

  22. Berger, Klaus. Apostelbrief und apostolische Rede: Zum Formular früchristlicher Briefe. Zeitschrift Für Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft. 1974; 65:190-231.

  23. ---. Die impliziten Gegner: Zur methode des Erschliessen von 'Gegnern' in neutestamentlichen Texten. in: D. Lührmann & G. Strecker, editors. Kirche: Festschrift für Günther Bornkamm. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck; 1980.

  24. ---. Formgeschichte des Neuen Testaments. Heidelberg: Quella & Meyer; 1984.

  25. ---. Hellenistiche Gattungen im Neuen Testament. in: W. Haase, editor. Aufstieg und Niedergang Der Römischen Welt. New York: De Gruyter; 1989; Pt.2, Vol. 25.2 pp. 1031-1432.

  26. Betz, Hans Dieter. 2 Corinthians 8 and 9. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1985.

  27. ---. Der Apostel Paulus und die sokratische Tradition. Tübingen: Mohr; 1972.

  28. ---. Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia. Philadelphia: Fortress; 1979.

  29. ---. The Literary Composition and Function of Paul's Letter to the Galatians. New Testament Studies. 1975; 21:353-379.

  30. ---. The Problem of Rhetoric and Theology According to the Apostle Paul. A. Vanhoye, editor. L'Apotre Paul. Personalité, Style et Conception du Ministère. Leuven: Leuven University Press; 1986.

  31. Bitzer, Lloyd F. The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1968; 1:1-14.

  32. ---. The Rhetorical Situation. in: W. R. Fisher, editor. Rhetoric: A Tradition in Transition. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan; 1974; pp. 247-260.

  33. Black, C. Clifton. Keeping up with Recent Studies; pt 16: Rhetorical Criticism and Biblical Interpretation. Expository Times. 1989 Apr; 100:252-258.

  34. ---. Rhetorical Criticism and the New Testament. Proceedings. 1988; 8:77-92.

  35. ---. Rhetorical Questions: the New Testament, Classical Rhetoric and Current Interpretation. Dialogue. 1990 Winter; 29:62-63, 68-71.

  36. Black, Clifton C. The Rhetorical Form of the Hellenistic Jewish and Early Christian Sermon: A Response to Lawrence Wills. Harvard Theological Review. 1988; 81:1-18.

  37. Black, David A. Hebrews 1:1-4: A Study in Discourse Analysis. Westminster Theological Journal. 1987 Spring; 49:175-194.

  38. ---. The Pauline Love Command: Structure, Style and Ethics in Romans 12:9-21. Filologia Neotestamentaria. 1989 May; 2:3-22.

  39. Black, Edwin. Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin; 1978.

  40. Blass, Friedrich. Die Rhythmen der asainischen und römischen Kunstprosa. Leipzig: Deichert; 1905.

  41. Boers, Hendrikus. The Form-Critical Study of Paul's Letters. New Testament Studies. 1976; 22(2):140-158.

  42. Bonhöffer, Adolf. Der Stil des Apostels Paulus. in. Epiktet und das Neue Testament. Giessen: Töpelmann; 1911; pp. 136-146.

  43. Bonner, Stanley F. Education in Ancient Rome. Berkeley: University of California; 1977.

  44. ---. Roman Declamation in Late Republic and Early Empire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1949.

  45. Boomershine, Thomas. Epistemology at the Turn of the Ages in Paul, Jesus and Mark: Rhetoric and Dialectic in Apocalyptic and the New Testament. in: J. Marcus and M. Soards, editors. Apocalyptic and the New Testament; 1989; pp. 147-167.

  46. . Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1987.

  47. Bormann, Ernest G. Rhetorical Criticism and Significant Form: A Humanistic Approach. in: K. Campbell and K. Jamieson, editors. Forms and Genre. Shaping Rhetorical Action. Falls Church, VA: The Speech Communication Association; n.d..

  48. Botha, Jan E. Jesus and the Samaritan Woman: A Speech Act Reading of John 4:1-42. Leiden: Brill; 1991.

  49. ---. On the 'Reinvention' of Rhetoric. J. C. Coetzee, editor. Koninkryk: Gees en Woord. Pretoria: N. G. Kerkboekhandel; 1988.

  50. Bradley, David G. The Topos as a Form in the Pauline Paraenesis. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1953; 72:238-246.

  51. Braet, A. The Classical Doctrine of Status and the Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1987; 20:79-93.

  52. Brake, Robert J. A Reconstruction of Aristotle's Concept of Topics. Central States Speech Journal. 1965 May; 16:106-112.

  53. Brandt, William J. The Rhetoric of Argumentation. New York: Irvington; 1984.

  54. Brandt, William. J. The Rhetoric of Argumentation. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; 1988.

  55. Breuer, D. Die Bedeutung der Rhetorik für TextInterpretation. H. F. Plett, editor. Rhetorik. Kritische Positionen zum Stand der Forschung. München: W. Fink; 1977; pp. 23-44.

  56. Brinsmead, Bernard H. Galatians: Dialogical Response to Opponents. Chico, CA: Scholars Press; 1982.

  57. Brinton, Alan. Situation in the Theory of Rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1981; 14:234-248.

  58. Brinton, Alan. Studies in the Theory of Rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1981 Fall; 14(4):234-248.

  59. Brock, Bernard L. and Robert L. Scott, editors. Methods of Rhetorical Criticism: A Twentieth-Century Perspective. 2nd ed. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1980.

  60. Brodie, Thomas L. Greco-Roman Imitation of Texts as a Partial Guide to Luke's Use of Sources. in: Charles H. Talbert, editor. Luke-Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature Seminar. New York: Crossroads; 1984; pp. 17-46.

  61. ---. Luke 7:36-50 as an internalization of 2 Kings 4:1-37: A Study in Luke's use of Rhetorical Imitation. Biblica. 1983; 64(4):457-485.

  62. . Brooks, C. and R. P. Warren. Modern Rhetoric. 4th ed. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich; 1979.

  63. Brunt, John C. More on Topos as a New Testament Form. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1985; 104:495-500.

  64. . Bühlmann, Walter and Karl Scherer. Stilfiguren der Bibel: Ein Kleines Nachschlagwerk. Fribourg: Schweizerisches Katholisches Bibelwerk; 1973.

  65. Bujard, Walter. Stilanalytische Untersuchungen zum Kolosserbrief. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht; 1973.

  66. Bullinger, Ernest W. Figures of Speech Used in the Bible Explained and Illustrated. Grand Rapids: Baker; 1968.

  67. . Bultmann, Rudolf. Der Stil der paulinischen Predigt und die kynisch-stoische Diatribe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht; 1984;(FRLANT; v. 13).

  68. . Bünker, Michael. Briefformular und rhetorische Disposition im 1. Korintherbrief. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht; 1984;(Göttingen Theologische Arbeiten; v. 28).

  69. Burgess, Theodore C. Epideictic Literature. University of Chicago Studies in Classical Philology. 1902; 3:89-261.

  70. . Burgess, Theodore C. Epideictic Literature. Reprint Edition ed. New York: Garland; 1987.

  71. Burke, Kenneth. The Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice Hall; 1953.

  72. ---. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Boston: Beacon Press; 1961.

  73. Bush, Roger Anthony. Mark's Call to Action: A Rhetorical Analysis of Mark 16:8. in: J. Morgan, editor. Church Divinity; 1985; pp. 22-30.

  74. Butts, James R. The Chreia in the Synoptic Gospels. Biblical Theology Bulletin. 1986 Oct; 16(4):132-138.

  75. ---. The Voyage of Discipleship: Narrative, Chreia and Call Story. in: William Stinespring and Craig A. Stephens, editors. Early Jewish and Christian Exegesis. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1986.

  76. Caird, G. B. The Language and Imagery of the Bible. Philadelphia: Westminster Press; 1980.

  77. Calloud, J. and F. Genuyt. La premièré épître de Pierre: Analyse sémiotique. Paris: Lectio Divina; 1982.

  78. Campbell, Douglas A. The Rhetoric of Righteousness in Romans 3.21 - 26. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press; 1992;(JSNTS Supplement Series; v. 65).

  79. . Campbell, K. K. and K. H. Jamieson, editors. Form and Genre: Shaping Rhetorical Action. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association; 1978.

  80. Carlston, Charles E. Proverbs, Maxims and the Historical Jesus. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1980 Mar; 99(1):87-105.

  81. Castelli, Elizabeth A. Imitating Paul: A Discourse of Power. Louisville: Westminster; 1991.

  82. Chevallier, M.-A. L'Argumentation de Paul dans II Cor 10 á 13. Revue D' Historie Et De Philosophie Religieuses. 1990; 70(1):3-15.

  83. Church, F. Forrester. Rhetorical Structure and Design in Paul's Letter to Philemon. Harvard Theological Review. 1978; 71:17-33.

  84. Cladder, H. J. Strophical Structure St. Jude's Epistle. Journal of Theological Studies. 1903; 5:589-601.

  85. Clark, Donald Lemen. Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education. Morningside Heights, NY: Columbia University Press; 1957.

  86. ---. The Rise and Fall of Progymnasmata in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Grammar Schools. Speech Monographs. 1952 Nov; 19(4):258-263.

  87. Clark, M. L. Higher Education in the Ancient World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1971.

  88. Classen, Carl Joachim. Paulus und die antike Rhetorik. Zeitschrift Für Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft. 1991; 82(1 - 2):1-33.

  89. Clauck, Hans Josef. Hellenistische Rhetorik im Diasporajudentum: das Exordium des vierten Makkabaeerbuchs (4 Makk 1:1-12). New Testament Studies. 1989; 35(3):451-465.

  90. Clavier, Henri. La Structure du 4 Ev. Revue D'Histoire Et De Philosophie Religieuses. 1955; 35:174-195.

  91. Cohen, Richard E. The Relationship Between Topic, Rhetoric, Logic: Analysis of a Syllogistic Passage in the Yerushalmi. in: Jacob Neusner and Ernst S. Frerich, editors. Judaic and Christian Interpretation of Texts: Contents and Contexts. Lanham, MD: University Press of America; 1987; II pp. 87-125.

  92. Consigny, Scott. Rhetoric and its Situations. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1974; 7(3):175-186.

  93. Cosby, Michael R. The Rhetorical Composition and Function of Hebrews 11 in Light of Example Lists in Antiquity. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press; 1988.

  94. ---. The Rhetorical Composition of Hebrews 11. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1988; 107:257-273.

  95. Cosgrove, Charles H. Arguing Like a Mere Human Being: Galatians 3:15-18 in Rhetorical Perspective. New Testament Studies. 1988; 34(4):536-549.

  96. Crafton, Jeffrey A. Paul's Rhetorical Vision and the Purpose of Romans: Towards a New Understanding. Novum Testamentum. 1990; 32(4):317-339.

  97. Cranfield, C. E. B. Changes of Person and Number in Paul's Epistles. M. D. Hooker and S. G. Wilson, editors. Paul and Paulinism: Essays in Honour of C. K. Barrett. London: SPCK; 1982; pp. 280-289.

  98. Cronje, Kobus J. van W. Defamiliarization in the Letter to the Galatians. in: A. K. Petzer & P. Hartin, editors. A South African Perspective on NT; 1986; pp. 214-227.

  99. Crook Margaret B., et al. The Bible in its Literary Associations. New York: Abingdon Press; 1938.

  100. Crotty, Robert B. Changing Fashions in Biblical Interpretation. Australian Biblical Review. 1985 Oct; 33:15-30.

  101. Cushman, D. P. and P. K. Thompkins. A Theory of Rhetoric for Contemporary Society. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1980; 13:43-67.

  102. D' Alton, John F. Roman Literary Theory and Criticism: A Study in Tendencies. New York: Russell and Russell; 1962.

  103. Dahl, Nils Alstrup. Adresse und Proömium des Epheserbriefes. Trierer Zeitschrifrt Rheimisches Landesmuseum. 1951; 7:241-265.

  104. Daube, David. Rabbinic Methods of Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric. Hebrew Union College Annual. 1949; 22:239-64.

  105. del Páramo, S. Las Fórmulas Protocolares en las Cartas del Nuevo Testamento. Estudia Biblia. 1951; 10:333-355.

  106. Descamps, A. La Structure de L'Epitre aux Hébreux. Revue Diocésaine De Tournai. 1954; 9:333-338.

  107. Dick, R. C. Topoi: An Approach to Inventing Arguments. Speech Teacher. 1964 Nov; 13:313-319.

  108. Dieter, Otto Alvin L. Stasis. Speech Monographs. 1950; 17:345-369.

  109. DiMarco, Angelico. Der Chiasmus in der Bibel. 3. Teil. Linguistica Biblica. 1977; 40.

  110. Diomedes. Artis Grammaticae. in: H. Keil, editor. Grammatici Latini. Hildesheim: Georg Olms; 1961; 1 pp. 300-529.

  111. Dobschütz, E. von. Zwei- und dreigliedrige Formeln. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1931; 50:117-147.

  112. Donelson, L. R. Pseudepigraphy and Ethical Argument in the Pastoral Epistles. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck); 1986.

  113. Donfried, K. P. False Presuppositions in the Study of Romans. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1974; 36:332-355.

  114. ---. False Presuppositions in the Study of Romans. in: K. P. Donfried, editor. The Romans Debate: Revised and Expanded Edition. Edinburgh: T and T Clark; 1991; pp. 102-124.

  115. Doty, William G. Letters in Primitive Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1973.

  116. Dressler, Wolfgang V. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer; 1973.

  117. ---. Textlinguistik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft; 1978.

  118. du Toit, A. B. Hyperbolic Contrasts: A Neglected Aspect of Paul's Style. Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense. 1985; 73.

  119. ---. Persuasion in Romans 1:1-17. Biblische Zeitschrift. 1989; 33(2):192-209.

  120. Duke, D. P. Irony in the Fourth Gospel. Atlanta: Knox; 1985.

  121. Duncan, T. S. Rhetorical Elements in the Letters of St Paul (Abstract). Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 1925; 56:xxxiii.

  122. Dunn, James D. G. The Incident at Antioch (Gal 2,11-18). Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 1983 Jun; 18:3-57.

  123. ---. Works of the Law and Curse of the Law (Gal 3.10-14). New Testament Studies. 1985 Oct; 31(4):523-542.

  124. Dupont, J. Le Probléme de La Structure Littéraire de L'Épître aux Rom. Revue Biblique. 1955; 62:365-397.

  125. Eden, Kathy. Hermeneutics and the Ancient Rhetorical Tradition. Rhetorica. 1987; 5:59-86.

  126. Elliott, Neil. The Rhetoric of Romans: Argumentative Constraint and Strategy and Paul's Dialogue with Judaism. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament; 1990.

  127. Ellul, D. Un example de cheminemet rhetorique: I Pierre. Revue D' Historie Et Philosophie Religieuses. 1990; 1(17 - 34).

  128. Evans, C. F. The Theology of Rhetoric: The Epistle to the Hebrews. London: Dr. William's Trust; 1988.

  129. Evans, G. R. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.

  130. ---. The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Road to Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

  131. Exler, Francis X. J. The Form of the Ancient Greek Letter of the Epistolary Papyri. Chicgo: Ares; 1976.

  132. Farenga, Vincent. Periphrasis on the Origin of Rhetoric. Modern Langauge Notes. 1979; 94:1033-55.

  133. Farrar, F. W. The Rhetoric of St. Paul. The Expositor. 1879; 10:1-27.

  134. Fiore, Benjamin. The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles. Rome: Pontifical Biblical institute; 1986.

  135. ---. Romans 9-11 and Classical Forensic Rhetoric. Proceedings. 1988; 8:17-126.

  136. Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler. The Ethics of Interpretation: De-Centering Biblical Scholarship. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1988; 107:3-17.

  137. ---. Rhetorical Situation and Historical Reconstruction in 1 Corinthians. New Testament Studies. 1987; 33:386-403.

  138. Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schüssler. The Followers of the Lamb: Visionary Rhetoric and Social-Political Situation. in: F. Segovia, editor. Discipleship in the New Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress; 1984.

  139. Fischel, Henry Albert. Rabbinic Literature and Greco-Roman Philosophy. A Study of Epicurea and Rhetorica in Early Midrashic Writings. Leiden: Brill; 1973.

  140. ---. Story and History: Observations on Greco-Roman Rhetoric and Pharisaism. Denis Sinor, editor. American Oriental Society, Middle West Branch, Semi-Centennial Volume. Bloomington, IL; 1969; pp. 59-78.

  141. ---. Story and History: Observations on Greco-Roman Rhetoric and Pharisaism. in: Henry Fischel, editor. Essays in Greco-Roman and Related Talmudic Literature. New York: Ktaw; 1977; pp. 443-472.

  142. ---. Studies in Cynicism and the Ancient Near East: the Transformation of a Chria. in: Jacob Neusner, editor. Religions in Antiquity. Leiden: E. J. Brill; 1968; pp. 372-411.

  143. ---. The Uses of Sorites (Climax, Gradatio). Hebrew University College Annual. 1973; 44:119-151.

  144. Fishel, Henry A. Rabbinic Literature and Greco-Roman Philosophy: A Study of Epicurea and Rhetorica in Early Midrashic Writings. Leiden; 1973;(Studia Post Biblica; v. 21).

  145. Fisher, James A. Pauline Literary Forms and Thought Patterns. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1977; 39(2):209-223.

  146. . Fisher, W. R., editor. Rhetoric: A Tradition in Transition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1974.

  147. Forbes, Christopher. Comparison, Self-Praise and Irony: Paul's Boasting and Conventions of Hellenistic Rhetoric. New Testament Studies. 1986; 32:1-30.

  148. Fraikin, Daniel. The Rhetorical Function of the Jews in Romans. in: P. Richardson and D. Granksou, editors. Anti-Judaism in Early Christianity: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 1986; 1 pp. 91-105.

  149. Frye, Northrup. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1981.

  150. Funk, Robert W. Language, Hermeneutic, and Word of God: The Problem of Language in the New Testament and Contemporary Theology. New York: Harper and Row; 1966.

  151. ---. Parable and Presence: Forms of the New Testament Tradition. Philadelphia: Fortress; 1982.

  152. ---. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge; 1989.

  153. Gadamer, Hans G. Rhetorik, Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik: metakritische Eroerterungen zu Wahrheit und Methode. in: K. Apel, et al, editors. Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik; 1971; pp. 57-82.

  154. Gennette, Gerard. Figures of Literary Discourse. New York: Columbia; 1982.

  155. Goulder, Michael. The Pauline Epistles. in: R. Alter and F. Kermode, editors. The Literary Guide to the Bible; 1987; pp. 479-502.

  156. Greenwood, David. Rhetorical Criticism and Formgeschichte: Some Considerations. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1970; 89:418-26.

  157. Hall, Robert G. Paul the Lawyer on Law. Journal of Law and Religion. 1985; 3(2):331-397.

  158. ---. The Rhetorical Outline for Galatians: A Reconsideration. Journal for Biblical Literature. 1987; 106(2):277-287.

  159. . Hansen, G. Walter. Abraham in Galatians: Epistolary and Rhetorical Contexts. Sheffield: Almond; 1989.

  160. Hanson, A. T. Studies in Paul's Technique and Theology. London/Grand Rapids: SPCK/Eerdmans; 1974.

  161. Harding, Mark. The Classical Rhetoric of Praise and the New Testament. Reformed Theology Review. 1986 Sep-1986 Dec 31; 45(3):73-82.

  162. Harnisch, Wolfgang. Einübung des neuen Seins: paulische Paränese am Beispiel des Galaterbriefes. Zeitschrift Für Theologie Und Kirche. 1987; 84(3):279-296.

  163. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Harry Caplan, translator. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1954;(The Loeb Classical Library.

  164. Hartman, Geoffrey H. and Sanford Budick. Midrash and Literature. New Haven/London: Yale University Press; 1986.

  165. Hartman, L. On Reading Others' Letters. W. E. Nickelsburg, editor. Christians Among Jews and Gentiles: Festschrift for Krister Stendahl. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1986.

  166. Hegermann, Harald. Paulus als Rhetor und Mystagoguge. J. Rologg, editor. Die Predigt als Kommunikation. Stuttgart: Calwer; 1972; pp. 44-59.

  167. Heiny, Stephen B. The Motive for Metaphor: 2 Corinthians 2:14-4:6. SBL Seminar Papers. 1987; 26:1-22.

  168. Hellholm, David. The Problem of Apocalyptic Genre and the Apocalypse of John. Semeia. 1986; 36:13-64.

  169. Hester, James D. The Rhetorical Structure of Galatians 1:11 - 2:14. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1984; 103(2):223-233.

  170. ---. The Use and influence of Rhetoric in Galatians 2:1-14. Theologische Zeitschrift. 1986; 42:386-408.

  171. Hock, Ronald F. and Edward N. O'Neil. The Chreia in Ancient Rhetoric
    Volume I: The Progymnasmata. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press; 1986.

  172. Hoffman, Joy J. Unmasking the Drama: The Rhetoric of John 9. in: J. Morgan, editor. Church Divinity; 1984; pp. 113-129.

  173. Holland, Glen S. The Tradition That You Received From Us: 2 Thessalonians in the Pauline Tradition. Tübingen: Mohr; 1988.

  174. Holtz, Traugott. Der antiochenische Zwischenfall (Galater 2.11-14). New Testament Studies. 1986 Jul; 32(3):344-361.

  175. Horna, K. Gnome, Gnomedichtung, Gnomologien. in: Pauly-Wissowa, editor. Realencyclopaedie. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler; 1935; 6.

  176. . Horner, W. B., editor. Historical Rhetoric: An Annotated Bibliography of Selected Sources in English. Boston: Hall; 1980.

  177. ---. The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric. New York: Columbia University Press; 1983.

  178. Horsley, Richard A. Wisdom of Word and Words of Wisdom in Corinth. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1977; 39:225-229.

  179. Howell, D. B. Matthew's inclusive Story: A Study in the Narrative Rhetoric of the First Gospel. Journal for the Study of The New Testament; 42:***.

  180. Hübner, Hans. Der Galaterbrief und das Verhältnis von antiker Rhetorik und Epistolographie. Theologische Literaturzeitung. 1984; 109:241-250.

  181. . Hughes, Frank W. Early Christian Rhetoric and 2 Thessalonians. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press; 1989;(Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series; v. 30).

  182. Hunsaker, David M. and Craig R. Smith. The Nature of Issues: (1) A Constructive Approach to Situational Rhetoric. Western Speech Communications. 1976 Summer; 40(3):144-155.

  183. Huth, L. Argumentationstheorie und Textanalyse. Deutschunterricht. 1975; 27:80-111.

  184. Hyde, M. J. and Craig R. Smith. Hermeneutics and Rhetoric: A Seen But Unobserved Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1979; 65:347-363.

  185. . Jackson, Jared J. and Martin Kessler, editors. Rhetorical Criticism: Essays on Honor of James Muilenberg. Pittsburg: Pickwick Press; 1974.

  186. Jegher-Bucher, Verena. Der Galaterbrief auf dem Hintergrund antiker Epistolographie und Rhetorik. Theologischer Verlag Zürich: Universität Basel; 1989.

  187. Jennrich, Walter A. Classical Rhetoric in the New Testament. Classical Journal. 1948; 44:30-32.

  188. Jeremias, Joachim. Chiasmus in den Paulusbriefen. Zeitschrift Für Die Neuetestamentliche Wissenschaft. 1958; 49:145-156.

  189. ---. Zum Gleichnis vom verlornenen Sohn (Lc 15:11 - 32). Trierer Zeitschrift. 1949; 5:228-231.

  190. Jewett, Robert. Following the Argument of Romans. Word and World. 1986(6):382-389.

  191. ---. Following the Argument of Romans. in: K. P. Donfried, editor. The Roman Debate: Revised and Expanded Edition. Edinburgh: T and T Clark; 1991; pp. 265-277.

  192. ---. Romans as an Ambassadorial Letter. Interpretation. 1982; 36:5-20.

  193. ---. The Thessalonian Correspondence: Pauline Rhetoric and Millenial Piety. Philadelphia: Fortress; 1986.

  194. Johanson, Bernard C. To All the Brethren: A Text-Linguistic and Rhetorical Approach to 1 Thessalonians. Lund: Almquist & Wiskell; 1987.

  195. Johnson, Luke Timothy. James 3:13-4:10 and the topos peri; fqounou'. Novum Testamentum. 1983 Oct; 25:327-347.

  196. Johnson, P. F. The Use of Statistics in the Analysis of the Characteristics of Pauline Writing. New Testament Studies. 1974; 20:92-100.

  197. Jones, M. The Style of Paul's Preaching. Exposition. 1917; 43(8):241-258.

  198. Jordan, M. Ancient Philosophic Protreptic and the Problem of Persuasive Genres. Rhetorica. 1986; 4:309-333.

  199. Judge, Edwin A. The Conflict of Educational Aims in New Testament Thought. Journal of Christian Education. 1966; 9:32-45.

  200. ---. Paul's Boasting in Relation to Contemporary Professional Practice. Australian Bible Review. 1968 Oct; 16:37-50.

  201. ---. St Paul and Classical Society. Jahrbuch Für Antike Und Christentum. 1972; 15:19-36.

  202. Kamlah, Erhard. Die Form der katalogischen Paränese in Neue Testament. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Siebeck); 1964.

  203. Katz, R. C. The Structure of Ancient Arguments: Rhetoric and Its Near Eastern Origins. New York: Shapolsky/Steinmatzky; 1986.

  204. Keller, Edmund B. Some Paradoxes of Paul. New York: Philosophical Library; 1974.

  205. Kemmler, Dieter Werner. Faith and Human Reason: A Study of Paul's Method of Preaching as Illustrated by 1-2 Thessalonians and Acts 17:2-4. Leiden: Brill; 1975.

  206. Kennedy, George A. New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1984.

  207. Kilgallen, John J. Acts 13:38-39: Culmination of Paul's Speech in Pisidia. Biblica. 1988; 69(4):480-506.

  208. ---. The Function of Stephen's Speech (Acts 7:2-53). Biblica. 1989; 70(2):173-193.

  209. Kim, Chan-Hie. Form and Structure of the Familiar Greek Letter of Recommendation. Missoula: Scholars Press; 1972.

  210. Kinneavey, James L. Greek Rhetorical Origins of Christian Faith: An inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.

  211. Kirby, John T. The Syntax of Romans 5.12: A Rhetorical Approach. New Testament Studies. 1987; 33(2):283-286.

  212. Klauck, Hans-Josef. Hellenistische Rhetorik im Diasporajudentum. Das Exordium des vierten Makkabäerbuchs (4 Makk 1. 1 - 12). New Testament Studies. 1989; 35(3):451-465.

  213. Klostermann, Erich. Zur Apologie des Paulus, Galater 1, 10 - 2,21. in. Gottes ist der Orient. Festschrift fur Otto Eissfeldt zu seinem 70. Geburtstag. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt; 1959.

  214. König, Eduard. Stilistik, Rhetorik in Bezug auf die biblische Literatur. Leipzig: T. Weicher; 1900.

  215. Kraftchick, Steven J. Why do the Rhetoricians Rage? in: Theodore Jennings, editor. Text and Logos. The Humanistic Interpretation of the New Testament. Atlanta: Scholar's Press; 1991; pp. 55-79.

  216. Kuck, David W. Judgement and Community Conflict: Paul's Use of Apocalyptic Judgement Language in 1 Corinthians 3:5-4:5. Leiden: Brill; 1991.

  217. Kurz, William S. Hellenistic Rhetoric in the Christological Proof of Luke-Acts. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1980; 42:171-195.

  218. La Verdiere, E. A. A Grammatical Ambiguity in 1 Peter 1:23. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1974; 36:89-94.

  219. Lambrecht, Jan. The Line of Thought in Gal. 2. 14b-21. New Testament Studies. 1978; 24(4):484-495.

  220. ---. Rhetorical Criticism and the New Testament. Bijdrage: Tijdschrift Voor Philosophie En Theologie. 1989; 50:239-253.

  221. Lampe, Peter. Theological Wisdom and the 'Word about the Cross': The Rhetorical Scheme of I Cor 1 - 4. Interpretation. 1990; 44(2):117-131.

  222. . Lanham, Richard A. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Second ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1991.

  223. Larson, Richard L. Lloyd Bitzer's 'Rhetorical Situation' and the Classification of Discourse: Problems and Implications. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1970; 3(3).

  224. . Laurand, Louis. Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Hakkert; 1965.

  225. ---. L'histoire deins les discours de Cicéron. Musée Belge: Revue De Philologie Classique. 1911; 15:5-34.

  226. . Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbuch der Literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner; 1990;2 vols.

  227. Lee, E. K. Words Denoting 'Pattern' in the New Testament. New Testament Studies. 1961; 8:166-173.

  228. Lee, G. M. Mc. 14:72. Expository Times. 1950; 61:159.

  229. Lenba, J. L. Signe et Symbole en Theologie: Etre et Penser. Neuchàtel. 1946; 13:137-178.

  230. Liftin, A. Duane. St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation: An investigation of I Corinthians 1 - 4 in the Light of Greco-Roman Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University; 1983.

  231. Lim, Timothy. 'Not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in the demonstration of the spirit and power' (1 Cor 2:1-5). Novum Testamentum. 1987 Apr; 29(2):137-149.

  232. Lindars, Barnabas. The Rhetorical Structure of Hebrews. New Testament Studies. 1989; 35(3):382-406.

  233. Lofthouse, W. F. 'I' and 'We' in the Pauline Letters. Expository Times. 1952; 64:241-245.

  234. ---. Singular and Plural in St. Paul's Letters. Expository Times. 1946; 58:179-182.

  235. Longnecker, R. N. Ancient Amanuenses and The Pauline Epistles. New Dimensions in New Testament Studies. Grand Rapids: Zondervan; 1974; pp. 281-297.

  236. Louw, J. P. Semantics of New Testament Greek. Philadelphia; 1982.

  237. Lund, Nils Wilhelm. Chiasmus in the New Testment: A Study in Formgeschichte. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1942.

  238. Lynch, Anthony. Pauline Rhetoric: 1 Corinthians 1:10 - 4:21. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina; 1981M. A. Thesis.

  239. Lyons, George. Pauline Autobiography: Towards a New Understanding. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press; 1985.

  240. Machon. The Fragments. A. S. F. Gow, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1965.

  241. Mack, Burton L. Anecdotes and Arguments in New Testament Studies: The Chreia in Antiquity and Early Christianity. Occasional Papers for the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity. 1987; no. 10:1-48.

  242. ---. Decoding the Scripture: Philo and the Rules of Rhetoric. in: F. E. Greenspahn & et al., editors. Nourished With Peace: Studies in Hellenistic Judaism in Memory of Samuel Sandnel. Chico, CA: Scholars; 1984.

  243. ---. A Myth of innocence: Mark and Christian Origins. Philadelphia: Fortress; 1988.

  244. ---. Rhetoric and the New Testament. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress; 1989.

  245. Mack, Burton L. and Vernon K. Robbins. Patterns of Persuasion in the Gospels. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge Press; 1988.

  246. Magass, Walter. Theophrast und Paulus: exemplarisch für Umstände und Ethos in Korinth und Saloniki. Kairos. 1984; 26(3-4):154-165.

  247. Mailloux, S. Rhetorical Hermeneutics. Critical Inquiry. 1985; 11:620-641.

  248. Malherbe, Abraham J. Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Ohio Journal of Religious Studies. 1977 Oct; 5(2):3-77.

  249. ---. Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1988.

  250. ---. The Cynic Epistles. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press; 1977.

  251. ---. Exhortation in First Thessalonians. Novum Testamentum. 1983; 25:238-256.

  252. ---. Moral Exhortation: A Greco-Roman Source Book. Philadelphia: Westminister Press; 1986.

  253. Marrou, H. I. A History of Education in Antiquity. London: Sheed and Ward; 1956.

  254. Marshall, Peter. Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians. Tübingen: Mohr; 1987.

  255. ---. Invective: Paul and His Enemies in Corinth. in: E. Conrad and E. Newing, editors. Perspectives on Language and Text; 1987; pp. 359-373.

  256. Maurer, Christian. Der Schulss 'a minore ad maius' als Element paulinischer Theologie. Theologische Literaturzeitung. 1960; 85(2):149-152.

  257. McDonald, James. Paul and the Preaching Ministry: A Reconsideration of 2 Cor 2:14-17 in its Context. Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 1983 Feb; 17:35-50.

  258. McGuire, Michael. The Strucure of Rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1982; 15(3):149-169.

  259. Meecham, H. G. The Use of the Participle for the Imperative in the New Testament. Expository Times. 1947; 58:207-208.

  260. Meeks, Wayne A. Review of Betz's Galatians. Journal for Biblical Literature. 1981; 100:304-307.

  261. Meynet, R. Analyse rhetorique du Prologue de Jean. Revue Biblique. 1989; 96(4):481-510.

  262. Minn, H. R. Effective Techniques in Pauline Diction (Words at Play, Pauline Mannerism). Prudentia. 1975; 7:89-93.

  263. Mitchell, Margaret Mary. Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Siebeck); 1991.

  264. Mohlberg, C. Zur Abfassung des Galaterbriefes. Schindler, P. Misc. Liturg. 1949; 2441-445.

  265. Mosdt, G. W. Rhetorik und Hermeneutik: Zur Konstitution der Neuzeitlichkeit. Antike Und Abendland. 1984; 30:62-79.

  266. Muilenburg, James. After Form Criticism What? Journal of Biblical Literature. 1969; 88:1-18.

  267. Mullins, Terence Y. Topos as a New Testament Form. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1980; 100:541-547.

  268. Musurillo, Herbert A. The Style of St. Paul. Theological Studies. 1956; 17:219-223.

  269. Neyrey, Jerome. The Forensic Speech and Paul's Trial Speeches in Acts 22 - 26: Form and Function. in: Charles Talbert, editor. Luke-Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature Seminar. New York: Crossroads; 1983; pp. 210-224.

  270. Nida, E. A. and J. P. Louw et al. Style and Discourse with Special Reference to the Text of the Greek New Testament. Cape Town: Bible Society of South Africa; 1983.

  271. Nida, Eugene A. Rhetoric and the Translator: With Special Reference to John 1. Bible Translator. 1982 Jul; 22(2):324-328.

  272. Nock, Arthur D. St. Paul. New York: Harper; 1939.

  273. . O'Connor, W. Robert. Greek Orations, 4th Century B.C. Prospect Heights: Waveland; 1966.

  274. Oberhelman, Steven M. Rhetoric and Homiletics in Fourth-Century Christian Literature: Prose Rhythm, Oratorical Style, and Preaching in the Works of Ambrose, Jerome and Augustine. Atlanta: Scholars; 1992.

  275. Olbricht, Thomas H. An Aristotelian Rhetorical Analysis of 1 Thessalonians. in: D. Balch & et al., editors. Greeks, Romans and Christians: Essays in Honor of Abraham Malherbe. Minneapolis: Fortress; 1990; pp. 216-236.

  276. Olson, Stanley N. Epistolary Uses of Self-confidence. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1984; 103(4):585-597.

  277. Olsson, B. Structure and Meaning in the Fourth Gospel: A Text-Linguistic Analysis of John 2, 1-11 and 4,1-42. Lund; 1982.

  278. Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York; 1982.

  279. ---. Ramus, Method and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge: Harvard; 1958.

  280. Palmer, Darryl W. Thanksgiving, Self-Defense and Exhortation in 1 Thessalonians 1-3. Colloquium (New Zealand). 1981 Oct; 14:23-31.

  281. Parks, E. Patrick. The Roman Rhetorical Schools as a Preparation for the Courts under the Early Empire. The Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Sciences. 1945; 63/213-122.

  282. Patrick, Dale and Allen Scult. Rhetoric and Biblical Interpretation. Sheffield: Almond; 1990.

  283. Patte, Daniel. Kingdom and Children: Aphorism, Chreia, Structure. Semeia. 1983; 29:1-130.

  284. ---. Paul's Faith and the Power of the Gospel. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1983.

  285. Patton, J. H. Causation and Creativity in Rhetorical Situations: Distinctions and Implications. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1979(65):36-55.

  286. . Perelman, Chaim. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications. Dordrecht: D. Reidel; 1979.

  287. ---. The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame; 1982.

  288. Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press; 1969.

  289. Pesch, Otto Herman. Der Professor unter den Aposteln: Paulus und Thomas von Aquin. Berkouwer and Oberman, editors. De dertiende apostel en het elfde gebod. Kampen: Kok; 1971.

  290. Petersen, Norman R. Rediscovering Paul: Philemon and the Sociology of Paul's Narrative World. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1985.

  291. Phillips, Gerald M. The Practice of Rhetoric at the Talmudic Academies. Speech Monographs. 1959; 26:37-46.

  292. . Plank, Karl A. Paul and the Irony of Affliction. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1987.

  293. Plett, Heinrich F. Einführung in die rhetorische textanalyse. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag; 1985.

  294. Plett, Heinrich F. Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse: Semiotik, Linguistik, Rhetorik. Heidelberg: Qvelle und Meyer; 1979.

  295. Pope, R. M. The Greek Style of St Paul. Expository Times. 1937; 49:534-535.

  296. Porter, Stanley E. The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference? Journal of Biblical Literature. 1991; 110(4):655-677.

  297. Prideaux, John. Sacred Eloquence: The Art of Rhetoric as it is Laid Down in Scripture. London: George Sawbridge; 1659.

  298. Ps-Augustine. De Rhetorica. O. A. Dieter & W. C. Kurth, translators. Speech Monographs. 1968; 3590-108.

  299. Quinn, Arthur. Rhetoric and the integrity of the Scripture. Communio (USA). 1986; 13(4):326-341.

  300. Rabinowitz, I. Pre-Modern Jewish Study of Rhetoric: An Introductory Bibliography. Rhetorica. 1985; 3(2):137-144.

  301. Räisänen, H. Galatians 2.16 and Paul's Break with Judaism. New Testament Studies. 1985 Oct; 31(4):543-553.

  302. Reedy, Ch. Rhetorical Concerns and Argumentative Techniques in Matthean Pronouncement Stories. Kent H. Richards, editor. SBL Seminar Papers. Chico: Scholars Press; 1983; 22 pp. 219-222.

  303. . Richards, E. Randolph. The Secretary in the Letters of Paul. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck); 1991;(Martin Hengel & Otfried Hofius. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchengen z. Neuen Testaments. 2. Reihe; v. 42).

  304. Rickman, H. P. Rhetoric and Hermeneutic. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1981; 14:100-111.

  305. Rigaux, Beda. The Letters of St Paul. Chicago: Franciscan Herald; 1968.

  306. Robbins, Charles. Rhetorical Structure of Philippians 2:6-11. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1980; 42:73-82.

  307. Robbins, Vernon K. The Chreia. in: David E. Aune, editor. Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament: Selected Forms and Genres. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1988; pp. 1-23.

  308. Robbins, Vernon K. Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1984.

  309. Robbins, Vernon K. Picking up the Fragments. Forum. 1985 Jun; 1(2):31-64.

  310. ---. Pragmatic Relations as Criterion for Authentic Sayings. Forum. 1985 Aug; 1(3):35-63.

  311. ---. Pronouncement Stories from a Rhetorical Perspective. Forum. 1988; 2(4):148-158.

  312. ---. A Rhetorical Typology for Classifying and Analyzing Pronouncement Stories. in: Kent Harold Richards, editor. Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers; Chicago. Chico: Scholars Press; 1984.

  313. ---. The Woman who Touched Jesus' Garment: Socio-Rhetorical Analysis of the Synoptic Accounts. New Testament Studies. 1987; 33:502-515.

  314. Robbins, Vernon K. and John H. Patton. Rhetorical and Biblical Criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1980; 66:327-350.

  315. Roberts, J. H. Pauline Transitions to the Letter Body. A. Vanhoye, editor. L'Apotre Paul. Leuven: Leuven University Press; 1986; pp. 93-99.

  316. . Roberts, Michael. Biblical Epic and Rhetorical Paraphrase in Late Antiquity. Liverpool: Cairns; 1985;(ARCA; v. 16).

  317. Sacks, Kenneth. Rhetorical Approaches to Greek History Writing in the Hellenistic Period. SBL Seminar Papers. 1984; 23:123-133.

  318. Sampley, J. Paul. Paul, His Opponents in 2 Corinthians 10-13, and the Rhetorical Handbooks. Jacob Neusner & et al., editors. The Social World of Formative Christianity and Judaism. Essays in Tribute to Howard Clark Kee. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1988; pp. 162-177.

  319. Sanders, E. P. Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People. Philadelphia: Fortress Press; 1983.

  320. . Schmeller, Thomas. Paulus und die 'Diatribe': Eine vergleichende StilInterpretation. Münster: Aschendorff; 1987;(Joachim Gnilka. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen; v. N.F. 19).

  321. Schneider, Gerhard. Der Stil der paulinischen 'Narrenrede'. Theologische Revue. 1978; 75(4).

  322. Schneider, Norbert. Die rhetorische Eigenart der paulinischen Antithese. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck; 1970.

  323. Schubert, P. Form and Function of the Pauline Thanksgivings. Berlin: Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft; 1939.

  324. Schubert, Paul. Form and Function of the Pauline Thanksgivings. Journal of Religion. 1939; 19:365-377.

  325. ---. The Structure and Significance of Lc 24. Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift Für Die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft. 1954; 21:165-186.

  326. Schutter, W. L. Hermeneutic and Composition in 1 Peter. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck); 1989.

  327. Scroggs, Robin. Paul as Rhetorician. Two Homilies in Romans 1-11. R. Hamerton-Kelly and Robin Scroggs, editors. Jews, Greeks, and Christians: Essays in Honor of W. D. Davies. Leiden: Brill; 1976; pp. 271-298.

  328. Scult, Allen. The Relationship Between Rhetoric and Hermeneutics Reconsidered. Central States Speech Journal. 1983; 34:221-228.

  329. Seaton, R. C. The Aristotelian Enthymeme. The Classical Review. 1914; 28:113-119.

  330. Sevenster, J. N. Paul and Seneca. London: Brill; 1961.

  331. Sider, Robert D. Ancient Rhetoric and the Art of Tertullian. London: Oxford; 1971.

  332. Siegert, Folker. Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Römer 9 bis 11. Tübingen: Mohr; 1985.

  333. Sigal, Phillip. Manifestations of Hellenistic Historiography in Select Judaic Literature. SBL Seminar Papers. 194; 23:160-185.

  334. Silberman, Lou H. Schoolboys and Storytellers: Some Comme New Testament Studies on Aphorisms and Chriae. Semeia. 1983; 29:109-15.

  335. Silva, Moises. The Pauline Style as Lexical Choice: Ginoskein and Related Verbs. Pauline Studies. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans; 1980; pp. 184-207.

  336. Sloane, T. O. Rhetoric: Rhetoric in Literature. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica. 15th ed. 1987; pp. 803-808.

  337. Smit, Joop. De rangorde in de kerk. Rhetorische analyse van 1 Kor 12. Tijdschrift Voor Theologie. 1989; 29:325-343.

  338. ---. The Genre of 1 Corinthians 13 in the Light of Classical Rhetoric. Novum Testamentum. 1991; 33(3):193-216.

  339. ---. The Letter to Galatians: A Deliberative Speech. New Testament Studies. 1989; 35:1-26.

  340. Smith, William A. Ancient Education. New York: Philosophical Library; 1955.

  341. Snyman, Andries H. On Studying the Figures (schemata) in the New Testament. Biblica. 1988; 69(1):93-107.

  342. ---. Remarks on the Stylistic Parallelisms in 1 Cor 13. in: K. Petzer and P. Hartin, editors. A South African Perspective on NT; 1986; pp. 202-213.

  343. ---. Style and Meaning in Romans 8:31-39. Neotestamentica. 1984; 18:94-103.

  344. ---. Style and the Rhetorical Situation of Rom 8.31-39. New Testament Studies. 1988; 34:218-231.

  345. Sonnino, Lee A. A Handbook to Sixteenth Century Rhetoric. New York: Barnes and Noble; 1968.

  346. Spencer, Aida Besançon. Paul's Literary Style: A Stylistic and Historical Comparison of II Corinthians 11:16-12:13, Romans 8:9-39 and Philippians 3:2-4:13. Jackson, MS: Evangelical Theological Society; 1984.

  347. ---. The Wise Fool (and the Foolish Wise): A Study of Irony in Paul (2 Cor 11:16-12:13). Novum Testamentum. 1981 Oct; 23:349-360.

  348. Staley, Jeffrey L. The Print's First Kiss: A Rhetorical investigation of the Implied Reader in the Fourth Gospel. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1988.

  349. Standaert, Benoit. La rhetorique antique et l'epitre aux galates. Foi Et Vie. 1985 Sep; 84(5):33-40.

  350. .Steinmann, A. Paulus als Schriftsteller. Eine literarhistorische Skizze. Theologie Und Glaube. 1917; 9:592-605.

  351. Stenger, Werner. Beobachtungen zur Argumentationsstruktur von 1 Kor 15. Linguistica Biblica. 1979; 45:71-128.

  352. Stirewalt, Martin L. Paul's Evaluation of Letter-Writing. in: J. M. Meyers, et al., editors. Search the Scriptures: New Testament Studies in Honor of Raymond T. Stamm. Leiden: Brill; 1969; pp. 185-196.

  353. Stobaeus. Concerning Marriage, Enkrateia and Sophrosyne. in: Vincent L. Wimbush, editor. Asceticism in Greco-Roman Antiquity: A SourcebookVincent L. Wimbush, translator. Minneapolis: Augsburg-Fortress Press; 1990; pp. 169-174.

  354. Stowers, Stanley K. The Diatribe. in: David Aune, editor. Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament; 1988; pp. 71-83.

  355. . Stowers, Stanley K. The Diatribe and Paul's Letter to the Romans. Chico: Scholars Press; 1981.

  356. . Stowers, Stanley K. Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Philadelphia: Westminster; 1986.

  357. ---. Paul's Dialogue with a Fellow Jew in Romans 3:1-9. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1984 Oct; 46:707-722.

  358. ---. Social Status, Public Speaking and Private Teaching: The Circumstances of Paul's Preaching Activity. Novum Testamentum. 1984; 26(1):59-82.

  359. Stroux, Johannes. Aus der Status - Lehre (zu Quintillian III, xi, 15-17). Philologus. 1929; 85:342-346.

  360. Suhl, Alfred. Paulus und seine Briefe. Gütersloh; 1975.

  361. Tannehill, Robert C. The Composition of Acts 3-5: Narrative Development and Echo Effect. SBL Seminar Papers. 1984; 23:217-240.

  362. The Venerable Bede. De Schematibus et Tropis. in: C. Halm, editor. Rhetores Latini Minores. Leipzig: Teubner; 1863; pp. 607-618.

  363. Thurén, Lauri. The Rhetorical Strategy of 1 Peter With Special Regard to Ambiguous Expressions. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Academy; 1990.

  364. Todorov, T. Rhétorique et Hermeneutique. Poetique. 1975; 23:289-415.

  365. Toulmin, Stephen E. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1958.

  366. . Toulmin, Stephen E. et al., editors. An Introduction to Reasoning. 2nd ed. New York: MacMillian; 1984.

  367. . Übelacker, Walter G. Der Hebräerbrief als Appell. Lund: Almqvist & Wiksell; 1989;(Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series; v. 21).

  368. van Eemeren, F. H. et al. Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. Dordrect/Providence, R. I.: Foris; 1987.

  369. van W. Cronjé, J. Defamiliarization in the Letter to the Galatians. in: J. H. Petzer & P. J. Hartin, editors. A Southern African Perspective on the New Testament. Leiden: E.J. Brill; 1986.

  370. Vargha, T. De Modis Exponendi Locutiones Tropicas S. Scripturae ad Usum Practicum. Verbum Domini. 1938; 18:21-26.

  371. Vatz, Richard E. The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1973 Summer; 6(3):154-161.

  372. Venerable Bede. Bede's De schematibus et tropis — A Translation. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1962; 48:237-253.

  373. . Volkmann, Richard. Die Rhetorik der Greichen und Römer in Systematischer Uebersicht. 3rd ed. Leipzig; 1901.

  374. Volkmann, Richard E. Hermagoras, oder Elemente der Rhetorik. Stettin: Th. von der Nahmer; 1965.

  375. Vouga, François. La construction de l'histoire en Galates 3-4. Zeitscrift Für Nestamentlichen Wissenschaft. 1984; 75(3-4):259-269.

  376. ---. Zur rhetorischen Gattung des Galaterbriefes. Zeitschrift Für Die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft. 1988; 79:291-292.

  377. Watson, Duane F. 1 Corinthians 10:23 - 11:1 in the Light of Greco-Roman Rhetoric: The Role of Rhetorical Questions. Journal for Biblical Literature. 1989; 108:301-318.

  378. Watson, Duane F. 1 John 2:12-14 as Distributio, Conduplicatio, and Expolitio: A Rhetorical Understanding. Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 1989; 35:97-110.

  379. ---. Invention, Arrangement, and Style: Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter. Atlanta: Scholars Press; 1988.

  380. ---. The New Testament and Greco-Roman Rhetoric: A Bibliography. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 1988 Dec; 31:465-472.

  381. . Watson, Duane F., editor. Persuasive Artistry: Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press; 1991.

  382. ---. A Rhetorical Analysis of 2 John According to Greco-Roman Convention. New Testament Studies. 1989; 35(1):104-130.

  383. ---. A Rhetorical Analysis of 3 John: A Study in Epistolary Rhetoric. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1989 Jul; 51:478-501.

  384. ---. A Rhetorical Analysis of Philippians and Its Implications for the Unity Question. Novum Testamentum. 1988; 30:***.

  385. Watt, J. G. van der. Colossians 1:3-12 considered as an exordium. Journal of Theology for Southern Africa. 1986 Dec; 57:32-42.

  386. Weiss, Johannes. Beiträge zur paulinischen Rhetorik. Theologische Studien. Herrn Wirkle, Oberkonsistorialrath Professor D. Bernhard Weiss zu seinem 70 Geburtstage dargebracht. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht; 1897.

  387. White, John L. The Body of the Greek Letter. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press; 1972.

  388. . White, John L. Light from Ancient Letters. Philadelphia: Fortress; 1986.

  389. Wilder, Amos N. The Language of the Gospel: Early Christian Rhetoric. New York: Harper and Row; 1964.

  390. ---. Scholars, Theologians, and Ancient Rhetoric. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1956; 75:1-11.

  391. Wilke, Christian G. Die neutestamentliche Rhetorik: Ein Seitenstück zur Grammtik des neutestamentlichen Sprachidioms. Dresden/Leipzig: Arnold; 1843.

  392. Wills, Lawrence. The Form of the Sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity. Harvard Theological Review. 1984; 77:277-299.

  393. Winger, Michael. Unreal Conditions in the Letters of Paul. Journal of Biblical Literature. 1986 Mar; 105(1):110-112.

  394. Wire, Antoinette Clark. The Corinthian Women Prophets: A Reconstruction from Paul's Rhetoric. Minneapolis: Fortress Press; 1990.

  395. Wolthuis, Thomas R. Jude and the Rhetorician: A Dialogue on the Rhetorical Nature of the Epistle of Jude. Calvin Theological Journal. 1989 Apr; 24:126-134.

  396. Wonneberger, R. Ansätze zu eine textlinguistischen Beschreibung der Argumentation bei Paulus. in: Meid and Keller, editors. Textlinguistik und Semantik. innsbruck: The University Press; 1976; pp. 159-78.

  397. ---. Textgliederung bei Paulus. in: H. Weber and H. Weydt. Sprachtheorie und Pragmatik. Tübingen; 1976; pp. 305-314.

  398. Wooten, Cecil W. The Ambassador's Speech: A Particularly Hellenistic Genre of Oratory. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1973; 59(2):207-212.

  399. Wuellner, Wilhelm H. Der Jakobusbrief im Licht der Rhetorik und Textpragmatik. Linguistica Biblica. 1978; 43:5-66.

  400. ---. Epistolography and Rhetoric in 1 Corinthians. Seminar on 1 Corinthians at the Cambridge, England Jubilee Conference of the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas; Cambridge, England.

  401. ---. Greek Rhetoric and Pauline Argumentation. in: William R. Schoedel & Robert L. Wilkin, editors. Early Christian Literature and the Classical intellectual Tradition: honorem Robert M. Grant. Paris: Beauchesne; 1979; Theologie Historique(53): pp. 177-188.

  402. . Wuellner, Wilhelm H. Hermeneutics and Rhetorics. Stellenbosch, RSA: Centre for Hermeneutical Studies; 1989;(SCRIPTURA; v. S 3).

  403. ---. Paul as Pastor. The Function of Rhetorical Questions in First Corinthians. in: A. Vanhoye, editor. L'Apotre Paul. Personalite, Style et Conception du Ministere. Leuven: Leuven University Press; 1986; pp. 49-77.

  404. ---. Paul's Rhetoric of Argumentation in Romans. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1976; 38:330-351.

  405. ---. Paul's Rhetoric of Argumentation in Romans: An Alternative to the Donfried-Karria Debate Over Romans. in: K. P. Donfried, editor. The Romans Debate: Revised and Expanded Edition. Edinburgh: T and T Clark; 1991; pp. 128-146.

  406. ---. Reading Romans in Context. Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas Seminar: Reader Response Criticism. Göttingen: University of Göttingen; 1987.

  407. ---. The Rhetorical Structure of 1 Thessalonians. in. Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense XXXVIII on the Thessalonian Correspondence; Louvain, Belguim.

  408. ---. The Rhetorical Structure of Luke 12 in Its Wider Context. Neotestamentica. 1988; 22:283-310.

  409. ---. Toposforschung und TorahInterpretation bei Paulus und Jesus. New Testament Studies. 1978; 24(4):463-483.

  410. ---. Where is Rhetorical Criticism Taking Us? Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 1987; 49(3):448-463.

  411. York, John O. The First Shall Be Last: Rhetorical Reversal in Luke. Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 1991; 37:***.

  412. . Zmijewski, Josef. Der Stil der paulinische 'Narrenrede': Analyse der Sprachgestatlung in 2. Kor 11,1 - 12,10 als Beitrag zur Methode von Stiluntersuchung neutestamentlichen Texte. Köln-Bonn: Peterhanster Verlag; 1978;(J. Botterweck & H. Zimmerman. Bonner Biblische Beiträge; v. 52).

  413. Zumstein, Jean. Analyse narrative, critique rhetorique et exegese johannique. in: P. Buhler and J. Habermacher, editors. La narration; 1988; p. 3756.

  414. ---. Narrative Analysis, Rhetorical Criticism and Johannine Exegesis. Elizabeth Castelli, translator1985 Spring; (Unpublished paper presented to the New Testament Seminar at the institute for Antiquity and Christianity.

  415. Zweck, Dean. The Exordium of the Areopagus Speech, Acts 17, 22.23. New Testament Studies. 1989; 35(1):94-103.

  416. Zyskind, Harold. The New Rhetoric and Formalism. Revue Internationale De Philosophie. 1979; 33:18-32.